20090609145906.207.0.jpg

先說明,不要把文章內容或任何一部分轉貼去任何地方/告訴任何人,

或和任何人公開/私下討論.請自重.No Excuse Again!

======================================================

Woke up to read the statements by  the management company and the press conference by the lawyer.  I've been anticipating this to take place.  Still, good to see that it is finally starting to happen!  About time!  The lawyer looked experienced and his explanation shed useful light on the prosecutor's evidence, and the issues regarding the relationship between the sentence and military service that were puzzling me.  The prosecutor's evidence is thin, as I suspected.  So the case is built around: 1.JH's confession (and there is some question based on the report whether he used once or twice -- maybe JH himself couldn't really be sure  because he was quite drunk); and 2) likely some corroborating statements by two drug traffickers/distributors who were under detention and were probably eager to give out names in exchange for leniency.  (Not sure what happened to the two club guys who were mentioned with JH in the police's announcement on April 26. Were they with JH and HY at the same time and therefore provided further corroborating evidence?  Were they charges? tried and sentenced? If so, what was the sentence?). 

特定醒來閱讀由JH管理公司所發出的聲明和由律師所建議招開的記者招待會。

我一直在預測這種情況的發生。儘管如此,我還是很高興地看到,它終於開始發生!

關於時間!

這位律師看起來很富有經驗。鑑於檢察官的證據,這位律師的解釋說明,燃點了有用的希望之光。

關於判處徒刑和軍事服務之間的關係,,是令我費解難明的。如我所懷疑,檢察官的證據是空洞的

所以這案件是建立在:


1.JH的自白(根據基本的報告,存在著一些問題:他是否使用了一次或兩次-也許JH本人也不能真正確定,因為他喝得很醉) ;


2.看起來,根據這兩名被拘留的毒販/分銷商的確證口供表示,很有可能,為了換取更寬大的處理,他們才急於供出了一些人的名字。


(根據警方在264所做出的宣佈中,提到與JH一起在警察局的,還包括了兩位一起出現在夜店的男子,不確定他們到底發生了什麼事。

是不是因為他們和JH還有HY在同一時間在一起,因此提供了進一步的佐證?他們會不會被指控?審判和判刑?如果是這樣的話,那他們所提供的,到底是什麼樣的口供? ) 。



(月亮注:關於這2位被保護的神秘男子,之前從一位熟悉韓文的麻吉中得知,他們的確坦承有和智勳在同一時間,同一地點-->HY的家,一起吸食了毒品.但是非常讓人費解的是,在所謂的調查報告結束後,這兩位非名人的涉嫌者,是沒有被警方公開他們的名字,更沒有被起訴!)

Based on some of the news reports, which mischaracterized and twisted what JH and the lawyer said at the trial, and the unfair criticisms by pundits and netizens, many  reporters and members of the public don't understand how different kinds of sentence affect military service.  One would think that they know a little better because military service has long been a big topic of discussion in Korea.  Luckily, I think the judge would understand exactly what JH and his attorney were talking about when they mentioned military service. 


根據一些新聞報導,還有一些學者和網民的不公平批評,已經誤解和扭曲了JH和律師在審訊時所說的話。

許多記者和市民不理解,為什麼不同類型的判處將會影響兵役。

人們可能會認為在這話題上,他們比別人知道得多一點,因為在韓國,服兵役一直是個被大肆討論的話題。

幸運的是,當JH和他的律師提到兵役論點時,我認為法官準確地了解了他們所真正想要討論的意思。

So the so-called trial looks to be over except for the sentencing announcement  on the 23rd.  Let's see if the judge would suspend (or not impose) any jail time.  If JH's very light record of use gets him a year, what would the court do with the other 70 users who were caught?


因此,所謂的求處刑罰,看起來已經超過(過於嚴厲)將在23日所宣布的判決。

讓我們看看法官是否將中止(或不施加)任何監禁時間。

如果JH因為非常輕微使用毒品的記錄而讓他被判刑一年徒刑,那麼,法院對於其他70個被捕獲的涉嫌使用者,又會做出什麼樣的處理方式呢?

 

PS--->簡單說:

美國律師認為這位莫名其妙的檢察官,只根據一些不實際的所謂證據,就堂而皇之地起訴智勳,再提出嚴厲的求處刑罰是很荒謬的一件事.在司法界可以說是一個大笑話.

而如果法官真的對智勳判處了嚴厲的懲罰,那麼在這之後,k國處理相關的案件,甚至比智勳還嚴重的毒品使用案件時,k國的司法界將沒有站得住的立場來應付源源不絕的質疑之聲..

韓飯發起請願信,已經開始行動了.我們目前等待韓飯的答覆,看看我們可否出一份力量.

FROM麻吉carol--律師跳出來是為了澄清智勳不是長期吸毒者,而且也反擊網友們的吸毒者用服役當作避風港,事實上如果受到緩刑1年以上的處分是無法現役入伍,一年以下是上下班專職預備役,如果是罰金處分才能現役入伍,就像之前某媒體很無聊的去問韓國兵役處,智勳是不是可以躲過兵役?他願意馬上去服役,還會讓人誤會,韓國人真的很喜歡把人逼入絕境.....


    全站熱搜

    Celest 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()